FOURTEENTH GENERATION
9988. Capt. John Gallup /Gollop
"GALLOP, or GALLUP, ...(9988) JOHN, Dorchester 1630, perhaps br. of the preced. rem. soon to Long island, part of Boston, 1632, was a fisherman and pilot, and prob. liv. alternate. down the harb. and up in town, where ho. and garden he had, as in the book of poss'sions. join. to the ch. 6 Jan. 1634, freem. 1 Apr. foll. brot. w. (9989) Christobel, wh. liv. to summer of 1655, and ch. (4994i) John, (4994v) Samuel, (4994vi) Nathaniel, and (4994i) Joan, wh. m. (4994i[1]) Thomas Joy; and he d. Jan. 1650. His will of 20 Dec. 1649, pro. 9 Feb. foll. provides for all these, and gives £2. to new meeting-house, then building; and the will of his wid. is to be seen in Geneal. Reg. V. 444, made 24 July 1655, pro. 31 Oct. foll. He seems, by his conduct in punishm. murderers of John Oldham, to have been very brave, and he left brave descend. [[vol. 2, p. 223]]"
-- James Savage, "A Genealogical Dictionary Of the First Settlers of New England, Before 1692" c/o http://www.usgennet.org/usa/topic/newengland/savage/
"GALLOP, or GALLUP, ...(9989v) SAMUEL, Boston, br. of the preced. b. in Eng. m. 20 Jan. 1651, (9989v[1]) Mary Phillips, had Mary, b. 4 Feb 1652; Hannah, 3 Sept. 1654; Samuel, 14 Feb. 1657; Mehitable, 5 Apr. 1659; freem. 1664; perhaps was of Turner's comp. in Philip's war, or may, more prob. have sent his s. of same name; and he d. bef. 1677."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
"GALLOP, or GALLUP, ...(9989vi) NATHANIEL, Boston, s. of (9988) John the first, b. in Eng. m. 11 June 1652, (9989vi[1]) Margaret Eveley, wh. in 1677, after his d. joined with Samuel's wid. in sale of the island est. of their f. His will, of 7 Mar. 1676, nam. s. Benjamin, and d. (9989vi_a) Susanna, w. of (9989vi_a[1]) John Butler."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
"(9988) John's most notable adventure was his encounter with a boat load of Indians, whom he captured and destroyed off Block Island with the aid of his two sons and a hired man. The Indians had murdered John Oldham, a man of ability, and they were having a hilarious time in his boat when they were over-taken by Captain Gallup. This has been called the first naval battle on the Atlantic coast, and it gave the Captain a Colonial and later a national reputation. It was one of the first skirmishes of the great Pequot Indian War."
"HARRIS, ...(9991vi[1]) THOMAS, Ipswich 1636, perhaps br. of Anthony, had ld. in Rowley 1644, m. 15 Nov. 1647, (9991vi) Martha, d. of (9991) Margaret Lake, had Thomas, b. 5 Aug. 1648; Martha, 8 Jan. 1651; John, 7 Jan. 1653; (4995iii[1]) Elizabeth 8 Feb. 1655; Margaret, 6 Aug. 1657; Mary, 31 Jan. 1660; William, 12 Dec. 1661; and Ebenezer; perhaps others; but only John, William, and Ebenezer, with his w. are ment. in his will of 16 July, pro. 14 Sept. 1687. Thomas and Elizabeth are named in the will of the gr.mo. Lake; and Margaret had, bef. 1680, m. John Staniford."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
"FELLOWS, ...(9993ii) SAMUEL, Salisbury, freem. 1645, a man of esteem, by w. (9993ii[1]) Ann, had Samuel, b. 13 Jan. 1647; and Hannah, 15 Sept. 1648. His w. d. 5 Dec. 1684; and he d. 6 Mar. 1698. Hannah m. 16 Nov. 1666, Nathaniel Brown."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
"FELLOWS, ...(9993iii) RICHARD, Hartford 1643, rem. 1659 to Springfield, soon to Northampton, and in 1661 to Hatfield, d. 1663, leav. wid. (9993iii[1]) Ursula, and ch. Richard, k. by the Ind. 25 Aug. 1675; Samuel, d. unm.; Sarah, wh. m. Samuel Billings, and next, Samuel Belding, both of Hatfield; and Mary, wh. m. Joseph Leonard of Springfield."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
"LAMSON, ...(9995ii[1]) WILLIAM, Ipswich, freem. 17 May 1637, d. 1 Feb. 1659, leav. w. (9995ii) Sarah, and eight ch. whose names are not seen. His wid. m. 10 Apr. 1661, Thomas Hartshorn of Reading. Of this name, that oft. in early rec. had its mid. letter b, or p, two had, in 1834, been gr. at Harv. and four at other N. E. coll."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
"HARTSHORN, ...(9995ii[2]) THOMAS, Reading one of the first sett. freem. 1648; had Thomas, b. 30 Sept. 1648; Benjamin, 8 Apr. 1654; Jonathan, 20 Aug 1656; David, 18 Oct. 1637; Susan, 2 Mar. 1660; and his w. Susan d. a few days after. He m. 10 Apr. 1661, ano. w. (9995ii) Sarah, wid. of (9995ii[1]) William Lamson, had Timothy, 23 Feb. foll."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
5 May 1646 Ipswich, Essex, MA
"AYRES, or AYER, ...(9995iii) JOHN, Ipswich, m. (9995iii[1]) Susanna, d. of Mark Symonds, had Edward, b. 12 Feb. 1659; Mark, 14 Dec. 1660; William, 1 May 1662; Nathaniel, 6 July 1664; and others, prob. as Sarah, John, Samuel, Thomas, and Joseph; rem. bef. 1672, to Brookfield, and was there k. by the Ind. 3 Aug. 1675. His wid. Susanna, d. 8 Feb. 1683."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
This line is confusing. John Ayres seems to have been the father of Samuel, who married Abigail Fellows. If he were also the brother of (4997) Mary, Abigail's mother, then Samuel would have married his first cousin.
"Savage, in his account, makes a mistake... (9995ii) Captain John Ayres of Ipswich and Brookfield was not the son of John Ayres of Haverhill. I have carefully examined the deeds of Salem, and have careful copies of the town records of Ipswich and Haverhill, and these show that the mistake had been made by confounding two persons of the same name. It has been suggested that he was the John Eyre, grocer of Norwich, England, age 40 in 1637, who went to Holland, but this seems highly improbable..."
"(9995ii[1]) William Lamson died at Ipswich in 1659, leaving eight children. His widow (9995ii) Sarah wished to marry one Thomas Hartshorn, but was opposed by her brothers (4996) William Fellows and (9995iii) John Ayres. Now as [John] Ayres married a (9995iii[1]) Symonds, and there is no record of any sisters of his wife who married Lamson and Fellows, it is fair to conclude that their wives were own sisters of John Ayres."
-- http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Meadows/7937/ayres_captjohn_d1675_whitmore_1870.htm
"Some researchers believe that (4997) Mary Ayres was a daughter of John and Hannah Ayer, who came to Mass. in 1637, were in Salisbury in 1640, and in Ipswich prior to 1645 when they moved to Haverhill. These Ayers has a son John and a daughter Mary, but no daughter Sarah is listed for them. Also, (4996) William Fellows had married Mary Ayres at least several years before 1640. So the question is how William could have met a daughter of John Ayer; it does not seem likely to have happened in Ispwich." <(Source: George Ellis Holberg, p. 49)
-- http://worldconnect.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=stolp&id=I28715
9996. poss. John Cross
"CROSS, ...(9996) JOHN, Ipswich 1635, by w. (9997) Ann had Ann, [[vol. 1, p. 478]] bapt. 9 Oct. 1638; rem. to Hampton, freem. 6 Sept. 1639, rep. 1640, perhaps in 1642 at Dover, and back again to I. d. 1652. His inv. of Sept. was of £382, 5, 2; and the only ch. (9997ii) Susanna m. (9997ii[1]) Thomas Hammond.
"...(9996) WILLIAM, Hartford 1645, says Hinman, 19, was of Fairfield 1649. There he d. a. 1655, leav. wid. and, perhaps, ch."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
9997. poss. Anna unknown
"HAMMOND, ...(9997ii[1]) THOMAS, Watertown, [[vol. 2, p. 347]] s. of William, b. in Eng. by w. (9997ii) Hannah, d. of (9996) John Cross, had only ch. and he posthum. Thomas, b. 11 July 1656; d. 10 Dec. 1655. His will of 21 Nov. preced. speaks of his est. in Lavenham, Suff'k. The wid. d. 24 Mar. 1657, and he will was pro. 8 Apr. next."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
"4 Crosses came to America from England.
William, John, Henry and Robert. Robert born 1613, died 1670 came to America on the ship "Mary and John" from Ipswich, (Suffolk,) England..."
-- http://genforum.genealogy.com/cgi-bin/pageload.cgi?robert,1613::cross::3372.html
"...the baptism date for Robert the immigrant cited by Harold Cross raises a question about the identity of both of (4998) Robert’s parents. Harold Cross states, "Robert Cross ... was born in Charlinch, Somersetshire, England 26 Jun 1613" to John Cross (Page 44 - and similar wording on page 30). He then cites Baty, "Robert Cross, baptized on 26 Jun 1612/13 ... was probably the son of John Crosse."
"Well I have Baty's book in front of me and she does say that on page 11, BUT she also provides information that contradicts that statement. On page 6, Baty says that a Robert Cross who was baptized on 26 Jun 1613 was the son of Thomas Cross and Rachel Dising, not John Cross. Moreover, by stating “I am inclined to give credence to the second family;” she is suggesting that John Cross is the more likely father, however, her reasoning implies that birthplace led her to this conclusion. Since she acknowledges that both Robert son of Thomas and Robert son of John were born in Charlinch, however, I do not understand how she can conclude that that suggests that John is the more likely father.
"Third, the cited immigration dates seem odd. Harold Cross cites Baty that Robert came on the "Mary and John" in 1634. Baty does state this but does not elaborate. Banks (originally published in 1930), however, does NOT list Robert among the passengers of the "Mary and John", which left 24 Mar 1634. Interestingly, Harold Cross states, “John immigrated to New England Apr 1634 [endnote 181]” I assume endnote 181 cites Banks, who does list John (age 50) and Ann (age 38) abroad the "Elizabeth" which left late Apr 1634.
"These dates suggest this is the John Crosse that Harold Cross says was christened in Saint Michael on 5 Jun 1584. Now IF Robert Cross left in Mar 1634 (needs evidence) and John Cross left in Apr 1634 (Banks), this supports the notion that John is the father of Robert, especially considering that they both settled in Ipswich. But assuming that they are father and son, why would they choose to endure a potentially dangerous 2½ month long voyage, leaving one month apart, rather than coming together. And why does John leave Ipswich only after a short time and eventually remove to Boston?"
-- Peter Blood peterblood666@joimail.com c/o http://genforum.genealogy.com/cgi-genforum/email.cgi?577811743
"JORDAN, JOURDAINE, or JOURDAN, ...(9998) STEPHEN, Ipswich 1634, came that yr. in the Mary and John, rem. to Newbury, d. 8 Feb. 1670, leav. wid. (9999) Susanna, wh. d. 25 Jan. 1673, and two ds. wh. had m. (4998) Robert Cross and (9999iii[1]) John Andrews, both at Ipswich."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
"ANDREWS, ...(9999iii[1]) JOHN, Ipswich 1642, had w. (9999iii) Jane, was oppress. imprison. by Andros' admin. liv. in 1701. He was then 80 yrs. old, and his w. if alive, was one yr. younger."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
= siblings
