FOURTEENTH GENERATION
31683, 49770 
9316. Henry Kimball/ Kembold
v. Richard Kimball
"KIMBALL, sometimes KEMBALL, (9317v_a) HENRY, Ipswich 1640, eldest s. of (9317v) Richard the first, perhaps sett. first at Watertown, and from Ipswich rem. and may have been the blacksmith of Boston, 1657, wh. had w. (9317v_a[1]) Mary, that outliv. him, and had admin. of his est. Jan. 1676; and s. Timothy finish. the settlem. of est. aft. d. of his mo. He was a man of large business."
-- James Savage, "A Genealogical Dictionary of The First Settlers of New England, Before 1692" c/o http://www.usgennet.org/usa/topic/newengland/savage/
d. Richard Kimball
1648 Ipswich, Essex, MA
1. Thomas Kemball
"KIMBALL, sometimes KEMBALL, (9317v_d) RICHARD, Bradford, s. of (9317v) Richard, b. in Eng. long liv. in Ipswich, but was of B. when freem. 1685."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
"KIMBALL, sometimes KEMBALL, (9317ii_h) THOMAS, Ipswich, s. of (9317ii) Richard, an early sett. of that pt. of Rowley, that aft. was call. Bradford, had eight ch. of wh. the eldest was Richard. He was k. by the Ind. 3 May 1676, when [[vol. 3, p. 23]] his w. (9317ii_h[1]) Mary and five ch. Joanna, Thomas, Joseph, Priscilla, and John, were tak. prison. carr. a. forty miles into the wilderness, and allow. to come home 13 June foll. His est. was good."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
"ALLEN, ...(9317ii_i[1]) EDWARD, Ipswich, acc. a very doubtful tradit. came from Scotland, 1636, m. a (9317ii_i) Kimball, and had, as runs [[vol. 1, p. 30]] the same story, fifteen s. and three ds. That acco. was giv. by Hon. Samuel C. Allen to Farmer. In the Hist. of Hubbard, wh. was his neighb. the burn. of his barn, 1670, is ment. With w. Sarah, wh. d. 12 June 1696, he rem. to Suffield, having had nine ch. and there had one, b. 1683; and ano. 1685.
"Of seven s. the names are told, but without dates, exc. John, wh. is said to have been b. a. 1660, and was k. by the Ind. 11 May 1704 as Deerfield, where he had liv. from 1685; Edward, wh. also liv. at D. there d. 1740, leav. a fam. William, wh. d. at Suffield; 1702; Benjamin, the anc. of Hon. Samuel C. had Joseph, wh. sett. at Deerfield; David, and Samuel, both, it is said, went to N. J. and Caleb, b. 31 Mar. 1685, prob. the youngest. Four ds. too are nam. Sarah, wh. m. 21 Apr. 1685, Edward Smith; Martha, wh. m. Samuel Kent, jr.; Abigail, m. Timothy Palmer; and Mary, of wh. nothing is told."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
j. Benjamin Kimball
16 Apr. 1661 Salisbury, Essex, MA
1. Richard Kimball
"KIMBALL, sometimes KEMBALL, (9317v_j) BENJAMIN, Rowley 1664, prob. s. of (9317v) Richard, had been, 1659, perhaps of Exeter, m. Apr. 1661, (9317v_j[1]) Mary, d. of Robert Hazeltine, had Ann, b. 22 Dec. foll. was freem. 1682."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
7 Nv. 1660 Ipswich, Essex, MA
"KIMBALL, sometimes KEMBALL, (9317v_k) CALEB, Ipswich 1665, s. prob. youngest of (9317v) Richard, had w. (9317v_k[1]) Hannah, and ch. Caleb, Ann, Elizabeth Abigail, Mary, Robert, and Benjamin, was k. by the Ind. 18 Sept. 1675, with the flower of Essex, under capt. Lothrop at Bloody brook."
"Savage wrongly gives the Caleb that was killed at Bloody Brook as the son of (9317v) Richard. [It was the son of (9317v_a1) John]"
"KIMBALL, sometimes KEMBALL, (9317v) RICHARD, Watertown, prob. br. of (4658) Henry of the same came from Ipswich, 0. E. 1634, aged 39, in the "Elizabeth", with w. (4658i[1]) Ursula; ch. (4658v_a) Henry, 15; (4658v_d) Richard, 11; (4658v_e) Mary, 9; (4658v_f) Martha, 5; (4658v_g) John, 3; and (4658v_h) Thomas, 1; and serv. John Laverick, 15; was freem. 6 May 1635; rem. 1638 to Ipswich, there had more ch. and d. 1675, leav. Henry, Richard, Mary, Thomas, (4658v_j) Benjamin, Elizabeth (4658v_k) Caleb, (4658v_i) Sarah, and ano. (4658v_b) d. w. of (4658v_b[1]) John Severns.
"He is call. by Thomas Scott (a passeng. with w. and fam. in the same sh.) br. and this may mean, that one m. a sis. of the other, or they m. sis. but in this case not, I judge. the mere ch. relationsh. See Scott. It is said, that two of his s. Thomas and William, were k. by the Ind. in 1675; but I suppose Caleb was one. A William K. of capt. Oliver's comp. was wound. 19 Dec. 1675, in the gr. battle of Narraganset, but he was of Boston, and serv. as substitute for his master, John Clear. An (4658v_c) Elizabeth K. aged 13, was passeng. in the same sh. with (4658) Henry and (4658v) Richard; but on the custom-ho. list is not insert. as ch. of either, but under the care of Thomas Reyner. (4658v_d)
"RICHARD, Bradford, s. of (4658v) Richard, b. in Eng. long liv. in Ipswich, but was of B. when freem. 1685."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
-- James Savage, op. cit.
-- http://genforum.genealogy.com/cgi-bin/pageload.cgi?caleb,bloody,brook::kimball::1320.html
"(9316) Henry owned land in Salem Mass in 1670 and 1676, and in Bradford Mass in 1677/8."
-- http://www.rgreen.org.uk/Kembold.html
"Both (4658) Henry and (9317v) Richard travelled to America on the "Elizabeth" which left Ipswich, Suffolk on 10 Apr 1634, (William Andrews, master). Included on the passenger list were Richard, age 39, wife (9317v[1]) Ursula and children (9317v_a) Henry age 15, (9317v_c) Elizabeth age 13, (9317v_d) Richard age 11, (9317v_e) Mary age 9, (9317v_f) Martha age 5, (9317v_g) John age 3 and (9317v_h) Thomas age 1. Richard and Henry had with them also Ursula's mother (Martha) and brother's family (Thomas and Elizabeth, both age 40)."
-- http://www.rgreen.org.uk/Kembold.html#23a
The line of (9317v) Richard Kimball has been determined to be of Haplogroup G2a*, and to be related to later Kimbells in North Carolina, Kimbrels in Georgia and Kimballs in Virginia and Vermont. Other Kimball lines tested in the Kimble/Kimball Y-Chromosome Study (KYCS) are of haplogroups other than G. Sample #31683, from a descendant of Richard's son Benjamin,
matches Ysearch (YSCH) user ID Q57MB53's results (also from a descendant of Richard) in 24/25 markers. This last user was further tested for subclades of G2a and found to be G2a3b. Another KYCS sample tested for over 25 markers, #49770 (from a descendant of Richard's son Richard), differs from the first in having a value of 17 for DYS 458. So far, no English samples are in the study, so connections to the Mother Country rely solely on the paper trail of wills and surveys, etc. In fact, I haven't seen any results for (4658) Henry's descendants yet: perhaps no male issue survives
[LAST REVISED 7 Nov. 2009]
|
Haplogroup |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
|||
|
KYCS#31683 /YSCH#Q57MB Richard Kimball b. 1595 Sufolk, England d. 1675 Ipswich, Essex, MA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
G2a3b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
HaplogroupG (of which G2a3b is a subclade) is widespread at low frequency throughout western Eurasia, from India and China to the British Isles. It is generally thought to have originated in the Middle East, and its greatest concentrations can be found in N. Ossetia and Georgia in the Caucasus region, and the Torgay district of N. Kazakhstan. The oldest known remains of Hg G were found in Bavaria, and are estimated to have been buried around 670 AD. The two samples were G2a*, but matched our Kembold DNA on only 64-77% of the 7-10 markers, respectively, that could be compared.
Suffolk County, England, was inhabited in turn by ancient Britons, Celts, Romans, Angles, Danes and Normans. The most likely candidates for our ancestors were Sarmato-Scythian auxiliaries among the Roman soldiers stationed in Britain and other frontier areas. The highest concentration of G2a3b is in Wales, to which the Roman remnants were driven by the invading Anglo-Saxons; and there is another high concentration in S. Germany /Switzerland. G2a3b is calculated to have separated from the main G population in the Caucasus around 2000 years ago, consistent with this hypothesis. The inhabitants of North Ossetia, the principal "G-men" in the homeland region, are primarily of Hg G2a1a, which separated from G2a3b long before Roman times, so these people (who are associated with the Caucasian Alans), are not the source of the Kimball DNA. A recently analyzed (unidentified) small minority group in the Caucasus does match the Kimball strain, however, so one may conclude that the hypothetical Roman auxiliaries were of a Sarmato-Scythian tribe that had been displaced westward by the Ossetians.
The map below shows the spread of the various G clades and sub-clades. A circle is notably absent from Britain, because the G2a3b sub-clade found there (to which our Kimballs belong) is of minor significance compared to the other sub-clades -- of which one, G2a3-U8 (probably connected with ehe Alan-Vandal migration of around 400 CE), is predominant. The presence of G2a in places as far afield as India and Libya indicates a spread during pre-Roman times: sometimes as conquerors (as, for instance, the Saka invaders of India), and other times as slaves, traders and auxiliaries.
1 J. Gardiner Bartlett, "Descendants of Deacon Gregory Stone of Cambridge, MA", p. 13 c/o http://worldconnect.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=:a11584&id=I0923
2 Mary W. S. Soper, "Roper Family Bible", p. 110 (1982) c/o above
3(no source given) c/o http://worldconnect.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=:347882&id=I02306
Note that none of the above are primary sources.
9319. Ursula (/Ussala) unknown
erected by descendants |
v. Gregory Stone
|
Stone, displaying typical early New England motif |
|
1. Nathaniel Stone
His will of 16 Apr. preced. calls him aged a. 64 yrs. abstr. in Geneal. Reg. VIII. 145, provides for wid. and the ten ch. Hannah m. 1 July 1658 the sec. John Bent of Marlborough; Mary m. 1665, Isaac Hunt, and next, 30 Sept. 1681, as his sec. w. Eliphalet Fox; Elizabeth m. Samuel Stow; Margaret m. 11 Jan. 1676, William Brown; Tabitha m. 2 or 27 (both dates giv. by Barry) Nov. 1674, John Rice; and Sarah m. Jacob Hill."
-- James Savage, op. cit.
"Any relationships between (9319v) Gregory, (9318[1]a) John, (9288) Simon and (9318[1]a1) Samuel Stone, are ambiguous on some genealogical records. After reading many sources of information, I find some obscurity toward the father of Samuel Stone and will offer a short elucidation of my own personal thoughts.
"No less [sic] that [sic] ten people named John Stone emigrated to New England in the mid seventeenth century, and controversy exists over who was the John Stone of Guilford, Connecticut. Was he the son of the Reverend Samuel Stone, or his father? The Rhode Island branch of Stones, claim that a John Stone, age 40, came to Salem, Massachusetts in April 1635. He being from Hawkhurst England in the ship "Elizabeth", removing to Guilford, Connecticut. In the John Stone genealogy, claim is made to John being the son of the Rev. Samuel Stone, who came with William Leet to Guilford on May 20, 1639. In Mr. Trumbull's 'Memorial History of Hartford, Connecticut (whose rhetoric I have chosen to believe), we find stated that: 'John Stone, who is the father of Rev. Stone, was a[n] original proprietor at Hartford Connecticut' and 'had his home lot the west side of Front Street.' He also states that he was allotted land here but conveyed it to his son Samuel as a gift before 1640. He again states that , 'he removed to Guilford where he was one of the signers of the original compact.' At Hartford he was referred to as: 'Mr. John Stone' on the date of Sep. 16, 1639. Mr. Trumbull further claims that John, the son of Rev. Samuel who went to Harvard Collage in 1653 and returned to England, graduated from Cambridge College and not returning to New England. Other theories exist and the reader should refer to them before making their own deductions.
"There is a possibility that (9318[1]a) John Stone was the child of (9318) David Stone of Great Bromley, Essex who was born there in 1540 and still living in 1597. David married first 10 July 1566, (9318[1]) Elizabeth Hewit, who d. abt. 1582. With her they had seven children, of whom their fourth child was named JOHN, bp. 6 Dec. 1573. The John Stone of this sketch was thought to have been born about 1571, so he could very well be the John Stone baptized in 1573. David Stone married abt 1584, as his second wife, (9319) Ursula (_______), and by her had four children of whom (9319v) Gregory Stone is one . If this assessment were correct, it would make John Stone of this sketch the half brother of Gregory Stone."
-- Richard M. Clark rclark001@ cenurytel.net c/o http://worldconnect.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=clarkrm&id=I702
The Stones of Cambridge have been determined through Family Tree DNA to be of Haplogroup I1. Typical of the family is ID#24133, which is shown below for the first 25 markers:
[LAST REVISED 29 Dec. 2009]
|
Haplogroup |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
DYS |
|||
|
#24133 (~Ysearch 75YZ6) Joseph Stone d. 19 July 1765 Farmington, CT <Nathaniel<Nathaniel<John<(9319v) Gregory | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Haplogroup I1 is commonly found in Scandanavia. Its presence in Suffolk and Essex are most likely attributable to either the Anglo Saxons or the Danes, both of which migrated to the area in large numbers. Because only a descendant of (9319v) Gregory was tested, the DNA results tell us nothing about which of the many John Stones in New England at the time was his father, nor where he came from.
= siblings
